Top related persons:
Top related locs:
Top related orgs:

Search resuls for: "Kagan"


25 mentions found


During oral arguments, justices asked questions about what constitutes coercion and in what cases the government can intervene with suggestions for the conduct of social media companies — and also showed off some of their media knowledge. AdvertisementMurthy v. Missouri is one of several cases the high court will hear about social media and the First Amendment this year. However, Roberts agreed with the pair and pointed out that government agencies do not have a "monolithic" point of view on moderation of social media content. An injunction previously handed down by the Fifth Circuit of Appeals on the same case barred a wide-ranging group of government officials from contacting social media companies. However, it is unlikely that the Supreme Court will uphold it, Vox reported.
Persons: , SCOTUS, Murthy, Moody, Paxton, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, George W, Bush, Elena Kagan, Clinton, Kavanaugh, Justice Kavanaugh, I've, Kagan, John Roberts, Roberts, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Jackson, J, Benjamin Aguiñaga, Aguiñaga, Biden, Vox Organizations: Service, Business, Centers for Disease Control, Department of Homeland Security, Facebook, Washington Post, Fifth Circuit, Supreme, Department of Justice, Louisiana Attorney Locations: . Missouri, Missouri, Louisiana, Washington
CNN —The Supreme Court on Monday appeared deeply skeptical of arguments by two conservative states that the First Amendment bars the government from pressuring social media platforms to remove online misinformation. Louisiana and Missouri accused the Biden administration of a sweeping censorship campaign conducted through emailed and other communications with social media platforms. Barrett asked: Could the FBI not call the social media sites and encourage them to take such posts down? Fletcher pointed to the context of the communication between the Biden administration and the social media companies. That is Congress’ role, he said, challenging claims that the administration has issued credible threats against social media that could support a coercion argument.
Persons: Biden, Roberts, Kavanaugh, Barrett, John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, , Roe, Wade, Benjamin Aguiñaga, Alito, Samuel Alito, ” Alito, Brian Fletcher, Elena Kagan, Justice Kavanaugh, I’ve, ” Kagan, chuckles, Fletcher, Ketanji Brown Jackson, you’re, ” Aguiñaga Organizations: CNN, FBI, Facebook, New York Times, Communications, medica Locations: Louisiana, Missouri
Prepare to be hounded with appointment reminders by phone. But now, medical practices are flooding patients with reminders of upcoming appointments — and warnings of cancellation penalties. The financial pressure for medical practices to keep patients from ghosting them is a major factor. But the notifications are getting worse because new software systems enabled medical providers to send automated messages to patients. The more reminders providers send, Kharraz said, the more patients tune them out.
Persons: , Oliver Kharraz, ” ZocDoc, Kharraz, , Ron Holder, “ We’ve, Emily Kagan Trenchard, Northwell, ZocDoc Organizations: New, New York CNN, Medical Group Management Locations: New York
The Supreme Court sided with the government on Friday, narrowly interpreting a provision of a landmark criminal justice law in a decision likely to limit the number of federal prisoners who are eligible for reduced sentences for nonviolent drug crimes. The majority opinion, written by Justice Elena Kagan, concluded that a criminal defendant must meet a series of criminal history conditions to qualify for relief. A failure to meet any of the criteria, she wrote, would render a prisoner ineligible. The case focused on who is eligible for shorter prison sentences under the First Step Act, bipartisan legislation passed in 2018 to address the human and financial costs of the country’s booming prison population. Under a provision known as the “safety valve,” judges can disregard federal mandatory minimum sentences for people with limited criminal history convicted of certain nonviolent drug offenses.
Persons: Justice Elena Kagan
Share Share Article via Facebook Share Article via Twitter Share Article via LinkedIn Share Article via EmailAppSumo CEO talks his journey to creating an $80 million per year tech companyNoah Kagan, AppSumo CEO, joins 'Last Call' for Make It Monday to share his journey from being fired from Facebook to creating his own the company that brings in $80 million per year.
Persons: Noah Kagan Organizations: Facebook
Read previewThe Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Monday that Donald Trump is eligible to run for president again, quashing legal challenges that loomed over the GOP frontrunner's candidacy for office. Instead, the court effectively foreclosed almost any challenge to a federal office holder under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, the insurrection clause. "Today, the majority goes beyond the necessities of this case to limit how Section 3 can bar an oathbreaking insurrectionist from becoming President," the justices wrote. The Supreme Court had never before issued a ruling on the post-Civil War era provision known as the "insurrectionist clause." The Supreme Court is set to hear separate arguments in April over whether Trump can be criminally prosecuted for election interference charges, including those stemming from his role during the January 6 attack on the Capitol.
Persons: , Donald Trump, SCOTUS, Trump, Steve Vladeck, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, John Robert's, Roe, Wade, Amy Coney Barrett, Barrett, overturns Organizations: Service, GOP, Trump, Business, Lawmakers, Congress, University of Texas, Austin, Colorado, Colorado's, Capitol, Department of Justice Locations: Colorado , Illinois, Maine, California , New York, Wisconsin, Colorado
“Responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates rests with Congress and not the States,” they wrote in a 20-page decision. “The judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court therefore cannot stand. The high court’s ruling resolves just one of two that could have sweeping implications for the 2024 election. “The Court has settled a politically charged issue in the volatile season of a Presidential election. Particularly in this circumstance, writings on the Court should turn the national temperature down, not up.
Persons: Donald Trump, , Trump’s, Trump, affirmatively, , , ’ ”, State Jena Griswold, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Amy Coney Barrett Organizations: Colorado Supreme, Capitol, Trump, Republican, Donald Trump View, National Government, United, Colorado, State Locations: Colorado, United States
The Supreme Court on Monday unanimously reversed the Colorado court ruling that barred former President Donald Trump from appearing on the state's Republican presidential primary ballot because of a provision in the U.S. Constitution related to people who engage in insurrection. "The judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court therefore cannot stand." "This suit was brought by Colorado voters under state law in state court," Barrett wrote. "The Court has settled a politically charged issue in the volatile season of a Presidential election," she wrote. Monday's ruling reverses decisions by two other states, Maine and Illinois, which acted after the Colorado Supreme Court, to bar Trump from their primary ballots.
Persons: Donald Trump, Trump, Joe, disqualifying Trump, Elena Kagan, Kagan, Sonya Sotamayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Amy Coney Barrett, Barrett Organizations: Republican, Colorado, Trump, U.S . Capitol, Electoral, Colorado Supreme Locations: Conway , South Carolina, Colorado, U.S, United States, Maine, Illinois
Those actions, the state court ruled, violated Section 3 of the 14th Amendment and left Trump ineligible to appear on the state’s ballot. Monday’s Supreme Court decision appeared certain to shut down those and other efforts to remove the frontrunner for the GOP nomination from the ballot. Supreme Court avoids insurrectionist debateThe Supreme Court’s opinion doesn’t directly address whether Trump’s actions on January 6 qualified as an “insurrection” – skirting an issue that the courts in Colorado wrestled with. “While the Supreme Court allowed Donald Trump back on the ballot on technical legal grounds, this was in no way a win for Trump,” Noah Bookbinder, the group’s president said. That decision, they said, wasn’t before the Supreme Court in the case and would “insulate all alleged insurrectionists” from future challenges.
Persons: Donald Trump, , , Trump, , Amy Coney Barrett, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Barrett, Trump’s, ” Noah Bookbinder, ’ Barrett, ” “, ” Barrett, – Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson –, wasn’t, insurrectionists ” Organizations: CNN, Capitol, Trump, GOP, US Capitol, Liberal Locations: Colorado, Colorado’s, Maine, Illinois, Washington, The Colorado
All the opinions focused on legal issues, and none took a position on whether Mr. Trump had engaged in insurrection. In an interview on a conservative radio program, Mr. Trump said he was pleased by the ruling. The Colorado Supreme Court affirmed the first part of the ruling — that Mr. Trump had engaged in an insurrection. Mr. Trump asked the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene, setting out more than half a dozen arguments about why the state court had gone astray and saying his removal would override the will of the voters. 23-719, is not the only one concerning Mr. Trump on the Supreme Court’s docket.
Persons: Donald J, Trump, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson —, , , John G, Roberts, ” “, Amy Coney Barrett, Barrett, Bush, Gore, George W, Mr, ” Mr, Trump’s, Anderson, Michael Gold Organizations: Trump, Congress, Jackson, Health Organization, Colorado, Republican, United, The, The Colorado Supreme, Colorado Supreme, Mr, U.S, Supreme Locations: Dobbs v, United States, Colorado, The Colorado, New York
CNN —Justice Amy Coney Barrett packed two very different messages into her one-page opinion on Monday as the Supreme Court declared states could not toss former President Donald Trump off the ballot. But then she admonished the court’s three liberal justices, who also split from the majority’s legal rationale, in unusually biting terms. “All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case,” Barrett wrote. Joining Roberts in the majority were Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. Echoes of John Roberts’ complaint about the liberalsIn criticizing the court’s critics, Barrett appeared to take a page from Roberts.
Persons: Amy Coney Barrett, Donald Trump, ” Barrett, Trump, Barrett, Bush, Gore, George W, Al Gore, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Wade, who’ve, John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, United States …, President Trump, Joe Biden, … ”, , Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Roberts, ” Roberts, Roe, , Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson Organizations: CNN, Supreme, Liberal, Texas Gov, White House, Senate, Colorado Supreme, United, Colorado Supreme Court, Capitol, Trump, Trump atty, Biden administration’s, Gore Locations: rebuking, Florida, Colorado, United States
“The Supreme Court had the opportunity in this case to exonerate Trump, and they chose not to do so. Using the 14th Amendment to derail Trump’s candidacy has always been seen as a legal longshot, but gained significant momentum with a win in Colorado’s top court in December, on its way to the US Supreme Court. But in Colorado, a series of decisions by state courts led to a case that Trump ultimately appealed to the US Supreme Court in January. The Colorado Supreme Court, on a sharply divided 4-3 vote, affirmed the findings about Trump’s role in the US Capitol attack but said that the ban did, in fact, apply to presidents. Trump is appealing, and a state court paused those proceedings while the Supreme Court dealt with the Colorado case.
Persons: Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Trump, John Roberts, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh –, , ” Trump, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Amy Coney Barrett, Steve Vladeck, Sotomayor, Kagan, Barrett, Jackson, ” SCOTUS, Trump’s, State Jena Griswold, ” Griswold, , Norma Anderson, Trump “, Roberts, Kavanaugh, lobbed, Jonathan Mitchell, Barack Obama, ” Kagan, Jason Murray, CNN’s Marshall Cohen, Devan Cole Organizations: CNN, GOP, Trump, University of Texas School of Law, US Capitol, Republican, Colorado, State, U.S, Democrats, Citizens, Colorado Supreme, Biden Locations: Colorado, Washington, U.S ., “ Colorado, Colorado’s, Maine and Illinois, Minnesota , Michigan , Massachusetts, Oregon, Maine, An Illinois, United States
CNN —The Supreme Court’s conservatives pressed the Biden administration Wednesday to justify a federal ban on bump stocks, a device that can convert a semi-automatic rifle into a weapon that can fire far more rapidly. The ATF reclassified the devices as machine guns in 2018. “And through many administrations, the government took the position that these bump stocks are not machine guns.”The court’s liberals seemed more certain the devices fell within what Congress intended when it banned machine guns. “That’s exactly what bump stocks do, as the Las Vegas shooting, vividly illustrated.”Justice Samuel Alito asked the attorney representing the ban’s challenger, Michael Cargill, if he could imagine the reasons why a lawmaker might ban machine guns but not bump stocks. “Bump stocks can help people who have disabilities, who have problems with finger dexterity, people who have arthritis in their fingers.
Persons: Donald Trump’s, Brett Kavanaugh, ensnare, you’re, ” Kavanaugh, Biden, “ That’s, It’s, Barrett, Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett, ” Barrett, , Neil Gorsuch, ” Gorsuch, Elena Kagan, Kagan, ” Brian Fletcher, Fletcher, ” Fletcher, , Samuel Alito, Michael Cargill, Jonathan Mitchell, Sonia Sotomayor, ” Kagan, Alito Organizations: CNN, Biden, Trump, Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, Explosives, ATF, Las Locations: Vegas
It’s obvious enough that the legislation would affect those social media giants, who are challenging the laws’ constitutionality through industry trade associations. But in scrutinizing the laws’ scope and First Amendment impacts, justices from both sides of the ideological spectrum worried Monday that the legislation’s effects could spill far beyond major social media platforms. “We’re talking about the classic social media platforms, but it looks to me like it could cover Uber. Social media applications are seen on an iPhone in this photo illustration taken on 10 November, 2023 in Warsaw, Poland. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP) (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images) Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty ImagesThat law permits social media users to try to sue platforms for violations.
Persons: CNN — Uber, , Henry Whitaker, , , Amy Coney Barrett, Sonia Sotomayor, Whitaker, Jaap Arriens, ” Whitaker, Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson, “ I’m, ” Jackson, Uber, Aaron Nielson, Barrett, ” Sotomayor, ” Nielson, ” Chris Marchese, ANDREW CABALLERO, REYNOLDS, Andrew Caballero, Reynolds, Neilson, ” Barrett, you’ve, Elena Kagan, you’re, Kagan Organizations: CNN, Facebook, YouTube, Web, LinkedIn, NetChoice Litigation, AFP, Getty, Texans, PayPal Locations: Texas, Florida, Warsaw, Poland, ” Texas, , Washington , DC, AFP, El Paso
CNN —House Speaker Mike Johnson has the fate of a democracy and a people in his hands. It’s not the United States, which will survive – even if the coming general election results in another existential test for the constitutional system. Johnson, a backbencher who was the last-ditch choice to lead the mutinous House GOP majority last year, could relieve Ukraine’s agony and help ensure its survival as an independent nation in the coming days. Nothing can be guaranteed in a fractious Congress, with a House GOP majority that has rendered the United States close to ungovernable and is threatening America’s global leadership role. And history is watching whether Speaker Johnson will put that bill on the floor.
Persons: Mike Johnson, It’s, Johnson, Vladimir Putin, , Donald Trump, speakership, Joe Biden, Kevin McCarthy, Volodymyr Zelensky, CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, McCarthy, Hakeem Jeffries, Mitch McConnell, Chuck Schumer —, , Jake Sullivan, ” Sullivan, Putin, ” Trump, Trump, Biden, ” Rep, Byron Donalds of, ” Zelensky, , ” Johnson, David Cameron, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Radoslaw Sikorski, ” Sikorski, CNN’s “ Fareed Zakaria, Seth Moulton of, Xi, ” Moulton, Frederick Kagan Organizations: CNN —, GOP, Pentagon, Democratic Senate, White, Trump, Republican, Democratic, Ukraine, ” Biden, Biden, Washington, Democrats, House Republicans, , CNN, British, ” Democratic, Seth Moulton of Massachusetts, CNN News Central, NATO, American Enterprise Institute Locations: United States, Ukraine, Russia, Kyiv, Louisiana, Western, Moscow, ungovernable, “ State, America, America’s, Byron Donalds of Florida, Zelensky, Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, British, Asia, Taiwan, Japan, China, Ukrainian
A stop sign as seen on traffic light near a statue at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC, February 26, 2024 as Justices are set to make a decision on landmark cases over social media content moderation. WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday questioned laws in Florida and Texas that seek to impose restrictions on the ability of social media companies to moderate content based on the assumption that they disfavor conservative speech. Various other tech companies that routinely moderate user content oppose the laws, including Reddit, Discord and Yelp. After the first of two oral arguments concerning the Florida law, it appeared a majority of the justices had concerns that the measure violates the free speech rights of big social media companies by prohibiting them from limiting the speech of some problematic users. The arguments over Texas' law were ongoing Monday afternoon.
Persons: WASHINGTON —, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch, Donald Trump Organizations: Facebook, YouTube, Computer and Communications Industry Association, Republican, Twitter, U.S, Capitol Locations: Washington , DC, WASHINGTON, Florida, Texas
Here are the key takeaways from the courtroom:How far does the First Amendment reach when it comes to social media? Online platforms engage in censorship when they silence certain users’ speech, the states argued to the court. In fact, the tech industry argued, government requirements that social media not moderate content would violate the platforms’ own First Amendment freedoms from government meddling. Section 230 features prominently in argumentsOne question kept coming up during the arguments, just as it has in lower courts: What these state laws could mean for Americans’ overall ability to sue social media companies over content moderation. The state laws explicitly allow users to sue tech platforms for alleged censorship.
Persons: Donald Trump, Samuel Alito, Biden, ” Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, , ” Kavanaugh, Elena Kagan, Elon Musk, ” Kagan, , – that’s, Kagan, Uber, you’re, Amy Coney Barrett, Organizations: CNN, Meta, , X, Elon, YouTube, Communications Locations: Texas, Florida
Supreme Court conservatives are accelerating their moves to overhaul the way the federal government protects Americans, whether from air pollution or unfair financial practices. The case has determined a swath of court judgments on agency policy, well beyond the environmental realms, and become one of the most cited rulings in Supreme Court history. The Corner Post is protesting a Federal Reserve rule adopted in 2011 that caps debit card fees merchants obtain with every transaction. Three Republican-led states and power industry groups turned to the high court, seeking immediate relief and asking that any implementation be barred. Kagan focused on the multiple preliminary issues that lower court judges would have typically assessed before the case reached the justices.
Persons: Donald Trump, won’t, Elena Kagan, Let’s, Trump, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, Barrett, Kagan, Benjamin Snyder, Chevron, Gorsuch, , ” Gorsuch, John Roberts, Snyder, , Ketanji Brown Jackson, Bryan Weir, ” Weir, Honig, Roberts, Malcolm Stewart, ” Jackson, Mathura, ” Sridharan, Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, Catherine Stetson, it’s Organizations: CNN, Securities, Exchange Commission, Food, Chevron, Natural Resources Defense Council, Department, Federal, , Federal Reserve, ” Liberal, Corner Post, Liberal, DC Circuit, Republican, EPA Locations: Washington, American, North Dakota, , Ohio
Kagan founded AppSumo over a weekend in 2010, spending $60 on a developer and a domain name. It took Kagan, now 41, just a few days in 2010 to found AppSumo, a company which brought in about $80 million in revenue last year. Get started nowYour natural instinct when looking to start a business may be to learn as much as you possibly can. "You have to practice the skill of asking," Kagan says. "Asking someone to be your customer, asking someone to be your partner, asking someone for feedback on your idea."
Persons: Kagan, AppSumo, Noah Kagan's, didn't, They'll, Get, You've, , you'll Organizations: Apple, PC, PayPal Locations: Pakistan
Not since the 2000 case of Bush v. Gore has the Supreme Court been in the middle of an election battle of such potential magnitude. Several of the justices’ spouses, including Jane Roberts, wife of the chief justice, sat in a special guest session. Roberts’ criticism of the Colorado Supreme Court decision barring Trump was echoed by his colleagues, even as they varied in their constitutional grounds. Just as Roberts can set the tone for oral arguments, the chief justice presides over their private votes on cases. As he strives for consensus, Roberts is likely to try to keep any separate, concurring opinions to a minimum.
Persons: CNN —, John Roberts, Donald Trump, Roberts, comity, Bush, Gore, Jane Roberts, Mark Paoletta, Clarence Thomas, Ginni, Trump, Jason Murray, , you’re, ” Murray, ” Roberts, United States …, Joe Biden, Jonathan Mitchell, , Brett Kavanaugh, Elena Kagan, Murray, ” Kagan Organizations: CNN, Republican, Democratic, Trump, Colorado Supreme, Colorado voters, United, Capitol, White, Liberal Locations: Colorado, United States, Wisconsin, Michigan
The court scheduled 80 minutes for the arguments that will kick off shortly after 10 a.m. Though the 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868, the court has never before wrestled with a claim based on the insurrection clause. The case, Trump v. Anderson, is on appeal from the Colorado Supreme Court, which in December ruled that the former president is no longer eligible to serve. Trump is simultaneously juggling four criminal prosecutions – including one that could reach the Supreme Court in coming days dealing with whether he can claim immunity from criminal prosecution. While the stakes for Trump are enormous, they are also significant for the Supreme Court.
Persons: Donald Trump’s, Bush, Gore, , Kermit Roosevelt, ” Trump, Anderson, Trump, Michael Gerhardt, John Roberts, Elena Kagan, Roberts, Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Kagan, Barack Obama, “ Roberts, ” Gerhardt, , ” CNN’s Marshall Cohen Organizations: CNN, GOP, Trump, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, Supreme, Colorado Supreme, Capitol, University of North, Republican, New, Interplay Locations: Colorado, Maine, University of North Carolina, Iowa, New Hampshire
If the Supreme Court ultimately rules against Trump it would almost certainly end his campaign for another term. But because the court expedited the earlier stages of the Trump ballot case, it is likely the court will want to move quickly to decide the case, potentially within a matter of weeks. If Trump is removed from the ballot in Colorado, Roberts predicted that states would eventually attempt to knock other candidates out of future elections. Trump and his allies raised the case during their written arguments to the Supreme Court. “It’s by the chief justice of the United States a year after the 14th Amendment,” Kavanaugh said in a reference to Chase.
Persons: Donald Trump, John Roberts, , Trump, Bush, Gore, George W, Brett Kavanaugh, Trump’s eligibly, Roberts, “ It’ll, ” Roberts, , United States …, Kavanaugh, Griffin, Salmon Chase, ” Kavanaugh, Chase, CNN Jackson, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Joe Biden, , , ” Jackson, Elena Kagan, ” Kagan, – Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, Kagan –, Jackson, didn’t, Jonathan Mitchell, ” Mitchell, Jason Murray, Jack Smith, Murray, Sharp, Kagan, “ It’s, Shannon Stevenson, Stevenson, Carlos Samour, could’ve Organizations: CNN, Trump, Capitol, United, Confederacy, Supreme, Union, Colorado, Colorado Supreme, Democratic Locations: Colorado, United States
It would be a daunting task for anyone making his first argument before the Supreme Court. He was also appearing before two of his former bosses: Justices Elena Kagan and Neil M. Gorsuch. After finishing Harvard Law School, he clerked for Justice Gorsuch, then a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, and later spent a year working for Justice Kagan, finishing in 2014. Each pummeled Mr. Murray with a punishing barrage of questions. Justice Kagan pushed Mr. Murray on the implications of allowing Colorado to ban Mr. Trump, questioning what would happen if the state at the heart of the case were instead a swing state like Michigan or Wisconsin.
Persons: Donald J, Trump, Jason Murray, Elena Kagan, Neil M, Gorsuch, Justice Gorsuch, Justice Kagan, Barack Obama, Mr, Murray Organizations: Harvard Law School, U.S ., Appeals, Circuit, Trump, Colorado Supreme Locations: Colorado, Michigan, Wisconsin
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday heard two hours of historic arguments in a Colorado case to remove former President Donald Trump from the ballot. Murray gave well-rehearsed arguments that won the day in the Colorado Supreme Court, whose 4-3 ruling that Trump was ineligible got the case to Washington. Salmon Chase, who was then the chief justice of the Supreme Court, heard the case while acting as an appellate judge. Going into the case, the prevailing view of legal experts was the Supreme Court would keep Trump on the ballot. Would it mean a reelected President Trump suddenly becomes ineligible.
Persons: Donald Trump, , TRUMP, Trump, Democrat Joe Biden, Elena Kagan, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanagh, John Roberts, Jason Murray, Murray, Salmon Chase, Chase, weren’t, Kavanagh, Ketanji Brown, Jackson, Amy Coney Barrett, Trump's lawyeer, Jonathan Mitchell, Mitchell Organizations: WASHINGTON, Republican, U.S, Capitol, Democrat, Colorado Supreme Locations: Colorado, Washington, Virginia
“What do you do with the – what would seem to me to be – the plain consequences of your position?" Chief Justice John Roberts asked attorney Jason Murray, who argued on behalf of the Colorado voters who brought the lawsuit. “The reason we’re here is because Donald Trump tried to disenfranchise 80 million voters,” he said. The Colorado Supreme Court agreed, ruling that Trump's conduct amounted to engaging in "insurrection" in violation of Section 3. But it is not the last time the Supreme Court will be called upon to settle questions with an outsized impact on the 2024 election.
Persons: Donald Trump, Trump, John Roberts, Jason Murray, Roberts, you’re, That’s, , Brett Kavanaugh, Murray, Elena Kagan, Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Kavanaugh, ” Jackson Organizations: Republican, Colorado voters, Democratic, Donald Trump View, Trump, Coloradans, Citizens, GOP, Capitol, The, The Colorado Supreme Locations: Colorado, United States, Washington, The Colorado
Total: 25